City of San Antonio, Texas v. Hotels.Com, L.P., et al
HOTELS.COM, L.P., TRIP NETWORK, INCORPORATED, doing business as Cheaptickets.com, PRICELINE.COM, INCORPORATED, INTERNETWORK PUBLISHING CORPORATION, doing business as Lodging.Com, TRAVELNOW.COM, INCORPORATED, ORBITZ, L.L.C., EXPEDIA, INCORPORATED, HOTWIRE, INCORPORATED, TRAVELWEB, L.L.C., SITE59.COM, L.L.C. and TRAVELOCITY.COM, L.P. |
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, On Behalf Of Itself And All Other Similarly Situated Texas Municipalities |
19-50701 |
July 30, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
City of San Antonio v. Hotels.Com, L.P. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Martha Sepeda is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:no longer working on this case. [19-50701] (MBC) [Entered: 09/19/2019 12:46 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50701] (Jennifer J. McGahey ) [Entered: 09/18/2019 01:05 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Anne Marie Seibel for party(s) Appellee Travelweb, L.L.C. Appellee Priceline.Com, Incorporated, in case 19-50701 [19-50701] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/18/2019 04:07 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50701] (Anne Marie Seibel ) [Entered: 09/18/2019 10:55 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jennifer J. McGahey for party(s) Appellee Travelweb, L.L.C. Appellee Priceline.Com, Incorporated, in case 19-50701 [19-50701] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/18/2019 04:12 PM] |
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas. Extension Granted to and including 11/07/2019. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 11/07/2019 for Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas [19-50701] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/06/2019 04:36 PM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas for filing Plaintiff-Appellant's Opening Brief until 11/07/2019 [19-50701] (Gary Cruciani ) [Entered: 09/06/2019 03:20 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50701] (DDL) [Entered: 08/29/2019 09:03 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/08/2019 for Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas. [19-50701] (DDL) [Entered: 08/29/2019 09:04 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Travelnow.Com, Incorporated in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Travelweb, L.L.C. in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Travelocity.Com, L.P. in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Site59.Com, L.L.C. in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Priceline.Com, Incorporated in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Orbitz, L.L.C. in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Internetwork Publishing Corporation in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Expedia, Incorporated in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Trip Network, Incorporated in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Hotwire, Incorporated in 19-50701, Attorney Les J. Strieber III for Appellee Hotels.Com, L.P. in 19-50701 [19-50701] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/27/2019 08:55 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Les J. Strieber, III for Expedia, Incorporated, Hotels.Com, L.P., Hotwire, Incorporated, Internetwork Publishing Corporation, Orbitz, L.L.C., Priceline.Com, Incorporated, Site59.Com, L.L.C., Travelnow.Com, Incorporated, Travelocity.Com, L.P., Travelweb, L.L.C. and Trip Network, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50701] (Les J. Strieber III) [Entered: 08/26/2019 03:32 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Gary Cruciani for Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas in 19-50701 [19-50701] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/13/2019 02:22 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Charles E. Fowler Jr. for party(s) Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas, in case 19-50701 [19-50701] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/13/2019 02:19 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50701] (Steven D. Wolens ) [Entered: 08/12/2019 11:45 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Steven D. Wolens for party(s) Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas, in case 19-50701 [19-50701] (CB) [Entered: 08/12/2019 01:14 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50701] (Gary Cruciani ) [Entered: 08/09/2019 03:10 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50701] (Charles E. Fowler Jr.) [Entered: 08/09/2019 01:18 PM] |
ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant City of San Antonio, Texasfor the Court to process. Date of service: 08/09/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Bernard, Cruciani, Fischer, Herrera, O'Connell, Sepeda, Sims; Attorney for Appellees: Herrington, Horth-Neubert, Rossman, Russell, Sloan, Stagner, Strieber, Warden. [19-50701] (Gary Cruciani ) [Entered: 08/09/2019 03:13 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 5:06-CV-381. Electronic ROA due on 08/26/2019. [19-50701] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/09/2019 03:51 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-50701] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/09/2019 03:50 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9113668-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 08/20/2019 for Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas [19-50701] (CB) [Entered: 08/05/2019 11:44 AM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant City of San Antonio, Texas [19-50701] (MVM) [Entered: 07/30/2019 08:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.