Jonathan Richardson v. University of Texas Systems, et al
| JONATHAN LEE RICHARDSON |
| CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS and GERALD LEWIS, Individually and is his offical capacity as a University of Texas at San Antonio Police Officer |
| 19-50811 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [9163487-2] [19-50811] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/09/2019 08:42 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kelsey Warren for Appellee Gerald Lewis in 19-50811 [19-50811] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/24/2019 12:36 PM] |
| Attorney Mr. Shawn Kevin Fitzpatrick for Appellee City of San Antonio, Texas is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The submitted appearance form does not match the registered attorney. [19-50811] (LBM) [Entered: 09/24/2019 12:37 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [9150516-2]. Date of service: 09/23/2019 Response/Opposition due on 10/03/2019. [19-50811] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellee Mr. Gerald Lewis to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [9150516-2]. Date of service: 09/23/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Fitzpatrick, Warren; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Hahn; Attorney for Appellant: House [19-50811] (Kelsey Warren ) [Entered: 09/23/2019 12:06 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50811] (Mark Kosanovich ) [Entered: 09/20/2019 05:43 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Kelsey Warren for Mr. Gerald Lewis for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50811] (Kelsey Warren ) [Entered: 09/20/2019 04:08 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9146951-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 10/03/2019 for Appellant Jonathan Lee Richardson [19-50811] (CCR) [Entered: 09/18/2019 08:15 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jonathan Lee Richardson [19-50811] (CCR) [Entered: 09/03/2019 01:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jonathan Richardson v. University of Texas Systems, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHARDSON | |
| Represented By: | Artessia K. House |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS | |
| Represented By: | Shawn Kevin Fitzpatrick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: GERALD LEWIS, Individually and is his offical capacity as a University of Texas at San Antonio Police Officer | |
| Represented By: | Ann Hahn |
| Represented By: | Kelsey Warren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
