Kriss Camp v. Kenneth Putnam, et al
| JUSTIN WADE, Security Major, LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, GLORIA MORALES, Food Service Manager, APRIL MACIAS, Food Service Manager, DIANE JUARDO, Food Service Manager, KENNETH PUTNAM, Warden and ROBERT ALMANZA, Assistant Warden |
| KRISS R. CAMP |
| 19-50842 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Kriss Camp v. Kenneth Putnam, et al |
| Camp v. Putnam, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50842] (LEF) [Entered: 10/22/2019 09:00 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Kriss R. Camp to proceed in forma pauperis (claiming IMMINENT DANGER) in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9161487-2] Fee deadline canceled. [19-50842] (CNF) [Entered: 10/07/2019 10:42 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:19-CV-20. Electronic ROA due on 10/22/2019. [19-50842] (CNF) [Entered: 10/07/2019 10:44 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9147769-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 10/03/2019 for Appellant Kriss R. Camp [19-50842] (LEF) [Entered: 09/18/2019 02:29 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Kriss R. Camp [19-50842] (RSM) [Entered: 09/13/2019 11:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
