Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. v. Lower Colorado River Authority
| PAPALOTE CREEK II, L.L.C., formerly known as Papalote Creek Windfarm II, L.L.C. |
| LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY |
| 19-50850 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. for filing Appellant's Opening Brief until 12/06/2019 [19-50850] (Benjamin Lee Mesches ) [Entered: 10/04/2019 01:12 PM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C.. Extension Granted to and including 12/06/2019. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 12/06/2019 for Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. [19-50850] (SDH) [Entered: 10/04/2019 01:19 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/06/2019 for Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C.. [19-50850] (MRW) [Entered: 09/27/2019 09:37 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50850] (MRW) [Entered: 09/27/2019 09:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Katherine Patrice Chiarello for party(s) Appellee Lower Colorado River Authority, in case 19-50850 [19-50850] (CB) [Entered: 09/24/2019 10:16 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Ryan A. Botkin for party(s) Appellee Lower Colorado River Authority, in case 19-50850 [19-50850] (CB) [Entered: 09/24/2019 10:13 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [19-50850] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 09/23/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Anigian, Jordan, Mesches, Thorne; Attorney for Appellee: Wise [19-50850] (Benjamin Lee Mesches ) [Entered: 09/23/2019 09:48 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:16-CV-1097; 1:19-CV-284. Electronic ROA due on 10/08/2019. [19-50850] (SDH) [Entered: 09/23/2019 10:28 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Richard D. Anigian for party(s) Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C., in case 19-50850 [19-50850] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/20/2019 04:48 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50850] (Katherine Patrice Chiarello ) [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:31 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50850] (Ryan A. Botkin ) [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:26 PM] |
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. James N. Rader is designated as inactive in this case. Reason: no longer representing party; party represented by other counsel. [19-50850] (RLL) [Entered: 09/20/2019 11:57 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jason Neal Jordan for party(s) Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C., in case 19-50850 [19-50850] (MRW) [Entered: 09/20/2019 01:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Leslie Conant Thorne for Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. in 19-50850 [19-50850] (MRW) [Entered: 09/20/2019 01:25 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Benjamin Lee Mesches for Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. in 19-50850 [19-50850] (MRW) [Entered: 09/20/2019 01:28 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: OK to Process with Special Issues to be Briefed. [9149635-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-50850] (MRW) [Entered: 09/20/2019 01:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Benjamin Lee Mesches for Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50850] (Benjamin Lee Mesches ) [Entered: 09/19/2019 04:04 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50850] (Jason Neal Jordan ) [Entered: 09/19/2019 04:07 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50850] (Richard D. Anigian ) [Entered: 09/19/2019 04:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Leslie Conant Thorne for Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50850] (Leslie Conant Thorne ) [Entered: 09/19/2019 04:10 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. [19-50850] (SDH) [Entered: 09/16/2019 03:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. v. Lower Colorado River Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: PAPALOTE CREEK II, L.L.C., formerly known as Papalote Creek Windfarm II, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Leslie Conant Thorne |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Lee Mesches |
| Represented By: | Richard D. Anigian Esq. |
| Represented By: | Jason Neal Jordan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY | |
| Represented By: | Robert Kenneth Wise |
| Represented By: | James N. Rader Esq. |
| Represented By: | Katherine Patrice Chiarello |
| Represented By: | Ryan A. Botkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
