Robert Johnson v. Kevin Portnoy, et al
ROBERT W. JOHNSON |
KEVIN S. PORTNOY, Doctor of Chiropractic, Auburndale Chiropractic, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, NATIONWIDE INSURANCE and JAIMIE COE, Victoria Fire and Casualty |
19-50905 |
October 2, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Robert W. Johnson. Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the citations to the record. Additionally the Brief requires brief cannot be handwritten; record excerpts required; 6 additional copies needed. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 1 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 12/02/2019 for Appellant Robert W. Johnson.. Record Excerpts due on 12/02/2019 for Appellant Robert W. Johnson [19-50905] (MVM) [Entered: 11/18/2019 11:50 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/25/2019 for Appellant Robert W. Johnson. [19-50905] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2019 07:44 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50905] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2019 07:42 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:19-CV-786. Electronic ROA due on 10/22/2019. [19-50905] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/07/2019 10:04 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9161408-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-50905] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/07/2019 10:02 AM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Robert W. Johnson [19-50905] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/02/2019 02:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.