Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated, et al v. Preferred Proppants, L.L.C.
| PREFERRED PROPPANTS, L.L.C. |
| PATSY WARD, As Trustee Of The Eidson Trust and SHOE-BAR RANCH, INCORPORATED |
| 19-50990 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellants Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated and Ms. Patsy Ward to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9216682-2]. Date of service: 12/23/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Asby, Estes, Sangalli, Sankey; Attorney for Appellants: Clinton, Davis, Griffis [19-50990] (Julie L. Griffis ) [Entered: 12/23/2019 03:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Diana M. Sangalli for party(s) Appellee Preferred Proppants, L.L.C., in case 19-50990 [19-50990] (CCR) [Entered: 11/27/2019 08:33 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50990] (Diana M. Sangalli ) [Entered: 11/25/2019 02:10 PM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated and Ms. Patsy Ward. Extension Granted to and including 01/16/2020. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 01/21/2020 for Appellants Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated and Patsy Ward [19-50990] (LRR) [Entered: 11/19/2019 11:24 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Thomas W. Sankey for party(s) Appellee Preferred Proppants, L.L.C., in case 19-50990 [19-50990] (RSM) [Entered: 11/19/2019 09:56 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Cameron J. Asby for party(s) Appellee Preferred Proppants, L.L.C., in case 19-50990 [19-50990] (RSM) [Entered: 11/19/2019 09:55 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50990] (Thomas W. Sankey ) [Entered: 11/18/2019 11:31 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50990] (Cameron J. Asby ) [Entered: 11/18/2019 11:22 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Allen Davis Jr. for Appellant Patsy Ward in 19-50990, Attorney John Allen Davis Jr. for Appellant Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated in 19-50990 [19-50990] (MRW) [Entered: 11/14/2019 02:43 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Julie L. Griffis for party(s) Appellant Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated Appellant Patsy Ward, in case 19-50990 [19-50990] (MRW) [Entered: 11/14/2019 02:41 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Ryan D. Clinton for party(s) Appellant Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated Appellant Patsy Ward, in case 19-50990 [19-50990] (MRW) [Entered: 11/14/2019 02:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50990] (Ryan D. Clinton ) [Entered: 11/12/2019 04:04 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50990] (Julie L. Griffis ) [Entered: 11/12/2019 03:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50990] (John Allen Davis Jr.) [Entered: 11/12/2019 03:37 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/17/2019 for Appellants Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated and Patsy Ward. [19-50990] (DDL) [Entered: 11/07/2019 01:28 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50990] (DDL) [Entered: 11/07/2019 01:27 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9179268-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-50990] (RLL) [Entered: 10/30/2019 12:22 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 7:17-CV-210. Electronic ROA due on 11/14/2019. [19-50990] (RLL) [Entered: 10/30/2019 12:25 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Shoe-Bar Ranch, Incorporated and Ms. Patsy Ward [19-50990] (RSM) [Entered: 10/25/2019 08:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
