Michelle Morris v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
| WARDEN JACQUELINE JONES, WARDEN KELLI FORRESTER and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
| MICHELLE A. MORRIS |
| 19-51104 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Michelle A. Morris advising transcript unnecessary No hearings [19-51104] (CNF) [Entered: 12/31/2019 08:29 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Alisha Jackson for Appellee Kelli Forrester in 19-51104, Attorney Alisha Jackson for Appellee Jacqueline Jones in 19-51104, Attorney Alisha Jackson for Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 19-51104 [19-51104] (MRW) [Entered: 12/18/2019 11:28 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Alisha Jackson for Ms. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Ms. Kelli Forrester and Ms. Jacqueline Jones for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-51104] (Alisha Jackson ) [Entered: 12/17/2019 03:45 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9207201-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 02/03/2020 for Appellant Michelle A. Morris [19-51104] (MRW) [Entered: 12/10/2019 12:52 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Michelle A. Morris [19-51104] (LEF) [Entered: 12/04/2019 01:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
