USA v. Julian Garza
| JULIAN ROSAS GARZA, also known as JuJu, also known as "Junior", also known as "J", also known as Julian Garza, also known as Julian Rosas |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-51184 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Julian Rosas Garza [19-51184] (WMJ) [Entered: 12/26/2019 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Julian Garza | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: JULIAN ROSAS GARZA, also known as JuJu, also known as "Junior", also known as "J", also known as Julian Garza, also known as Julian Rosas | |
| Represented By: | Robert Otto Switzer Esq. I |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H. Gay Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
