USA v. Gail Owens
| GAIL OWENS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-60101 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting in part Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Ms. Gail Owens [ # 9025161-2 ] Motion due deadline updated to 05/07/2019 for Appellant Gail Owens. Brief in Support deadline updated to 05/07/2019 for Appellant Gail Owens [19-60101] (MRW) [Entered: 04/09/2019 11:01 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Gail Owens to extend time to comply with COA requirements until 05/20/2019 [9025161-2]. Date of service: 04/02/2019 [19-60101] (MRW) [Entered: 04/09/2019 10:40 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Gail Owens to proceed in forma pauperis [9025189-2] Fee deadline canceled. [19-60101] (MRW) [Entered: 04/09/2019 10:54 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-60101] (DDL) [Entered: 03/14/2019 12:52 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 04/22/2019 for Appellant Gail Owens. Brief in Support due on 04/22/2019 for Appellant Gail Owens. Fee deadline updated to 04/22/2019 for Appellant Gail Owens [19-60101] (CB) [Entered: 03/11/2019 12:46 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:18-CV-129. Electronic ROA due on 03/26/2019. [19-60101] (CB) [Entered: 03/11/2019 12:45 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/25/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Gail Owens. [19-60101] (CB) [Entered: 03/11/2019 12:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Gaines H. Cleveland for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 19-60101 [19-60101] (NFD) [Entered: 02/26/2019 09:56 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Arthur Meynardie for Appellee USA in 19-60101 [19-60101] (NFD) [Entered: 02/26/2019 09:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-60101] (Gaines H. Cleveland ) [Entered: 02/23/2019 09:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. John Arthur Meynardie, Esq. for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-60101] (John Arthur Meynardie ) [Entered: 02/23/2019 09:15 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8989225-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [19-60101] (IFP pending in District Court) (NFD) [Entered: 02/21/2019 11:19 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Gail Owens [19-60101] (NFD) [Entered: 02/15/2019 12:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Gail Owens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: GAIL OWENS | |
| Represented By: | Gail Owens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Gaines H. Cleveland |
| Represented By: | John Arthur Meynardie Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
