Chakakhan Davis v. Hinds County, Mississippi, et al
Defendant / Appellee: HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, SERGEANT BOBBY MELSON, OFFICER BRENDA JONES, TYRONE LEWIS and DEPUTY CHRIS MADDOX
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHAKAKHAN R. DAVIS
Case Number: 19-60132
Filed: March 1, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2019 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Ms. Chakakhan R. Davis. [19-60132] (MCS) [Entered: 03/25/2019 03:03 PM]
March 25, 2019 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: This letter is from Ms. Davis advising the clerk's office that the motion for IFP received on 2/27/19 in 18-60681, should be filed in 19-60132. A motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending in the District Court. If the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied in the District Court then you will file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [19-60132] (MCS) [Entered: 03/25/2019 02:46 PM]
March 6, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for ruling on Motion for an Extension of Time to Perfect Appeal (doc.# 187). [8997911-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-60132] (DLJ) [Entered: 03/06/2019 10:55 AM]
March 1, 2019 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Chakakhan R. Davis. [19-60132] (DLJ) [Entered: 03/01/2019 08:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chakakhan Davis v. Hinds County, Mississippi, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
Represented By: William Robert Allen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SERGEANT BOBBY MELSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: OFFICER BRENDA JONES
Represented By: William Robert Allen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TYRONE LEWIS
Represented By: William Robert Allen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEPUTY CHRIS MADDOX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHAKAKHAN R. DAVIS
Represented By: Chakakhan R. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?