Reach, Incorporated v. J. Smith
J. STEPHEN SMITH |
REACH, INCORPORATED |
19-60175 |
March 19, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Reach, Incorporated. Extension Granted to and including 06/12/2019. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/12/2019 for Appellant Reach, Incorporated. [19-60175] (RLL) [Entered: 05/14/2019 10:17 AM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Reach, Incorporated for filing Request for Extension of Time to file Brief of Appellant until 06/12/2019 [19-60175] (Henry Lee Penick ) [Entered: 05/13/2019 03:49 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jimmy Fred Spencer Jr. for Appellee J. Stephen Smith in 19-60175 [19-60175] (RLL) [Entered: 04/10/2019 11:18 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jerald D. Crawford I for Appellant Reach, Incorporated in 19-60175 [19-60175] (RLL) [Entered: 04/10/2019 02:55 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-60175] (Jerald D. Crawford I) [Entered: 04/09/2019 10:11 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Henry Lee Penick for Appellant Reach, Incorporated in 19-60175 [19-60175] (RLL) [Entered: 04/08/2019 12:51 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Henry Lee Penick for Reach, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-60175] (Henry Lee Penick ) [Entered: 04/05/2019 05:06 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-60175] (Jimmy Fred Spencer Jr.) [Entered: 04/05/2019 11:20 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Joseph Collins Wohner Jr. for party(s) Appellee J. Stephen Smith, in case 19-60175 [19-60175] (RLL) [Entered: 04/04/2019 12:13 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-60175] (Joseph Collins Wohner Jr.) [Entered: 04/02/2019 05:36 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-60175] (DDL) [Entered: 04/01/2019 03:25 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/13/2019 for Appellant Reach, Incorporated. [19-60175] (DDL) [Entered: 04/01/2019 03:29 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9013810-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-60175] (CSG) [Entered: 03/26/2019 09:51 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:18-CV-350. Electronic ROA due on 04/10/2019. [19-60175] (CSG) [Entered: 03/26/2019 10:21 AM] |
BANKRUPTCY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Reach, Incorporated [19-60175] (CSG) [Entered: 03/19/2019 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Reach, Incorporated v. J. Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: J. STEPHEN SMITH | |
Represented By: | Jimmy Fred Spencer Esq. Jr. |
Represented By: | Eileen N. Shaffer |
Represented By: | Joseph Collins Wohner Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellant: REACH, INCORPORATED | |
Represented By: | Henry Lee Penick |
Represented By: | Jerald D. Crawford I |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.