Ronnie Smith v. Pelicia Hall, et al
JOE ERRINGTON, Superintendent of South Mississippi Correctional Institution, PELICIA HALL and R. PENNINGTON |
RONNIE EDWARD SMITH |
19-60316 |
May 13, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Ronnie Smith v. Pelicia Hall, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-60316] (MRW) [Entered: 06/13/2019 03:20 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:18-CV-128. Electronic ROA due on 06/26/2019. [19-60316] (MRW) [Entered: 06/11/2019 09:52 AM] |
BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Ronnie Edward Smith in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9072726-2 ]. [9072734-1] [19-60316] (MRW) [Entered: 06/11/2019 09:52 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Ronnie Edward Smith to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9072726-2] Fee deadline canceled. [19-60316] (MRW) [Entered: 06/11/2019 09:49 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/15/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Ronnie Edward Smith because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due on 07/01/2019 for Appellant Ronnie Edward Smith [19-60316] (MAS) [Entered: 05/30/2019 08:54 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9052241-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (IFP pending DC). [19-60316] (SMC) [Entered: 05/14/2019 12:49 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ronnie Smith [19-60316] (SMC) [Entered: 05/13/2019 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.