Juan Beltran-Ortiz v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
| JUAN BELTRAN-ORTIZ, also known as Juan Beltran |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 19-60565 |
| July 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Juan Beltran-Ortiz. Date received in 5th Circuit: 07/25/2019. Immigration File Number: a091 241 425 Administrative Record due on 09/04/2019 [19-60565] (CB) [Entered: 07/26/2019 08:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Juan Beltran-Ortiz v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Lynda A. Do |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JUAN BELTRAN-ORTIZ, also known as Juan Beltran | |
| Represented By: | Anuj Arun Shah Ph. D. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
