Matthew Huskey v. Marshall Fisher, et al
| MATTHEW HUSKEY |
| DONOVAN CLARK, Officer (Unit 29), TOMMY HERRING, Officer (K-9 Unit), MARY JONES, Captain (Unit 29), DERRICK MUNFORD, Captain (Unit 29) and "JOHN DOE" GRIFFIN, Lieutenant (Key Control) |
| 19-60588 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Huskey v. Jones, et al |
 Huskey v. Jones, et al
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/01/2019 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Matthew Huskey. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [19-60588] (RLL) [Entered: 10/01/2019 04:25 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Matthew Huskey to appoint counsel [9152661-2]. [19-60588] Affidavit due on 10/07/2019 for Appellant Matthew Huskey. [19-60588] (MRW) [Entered: 09/25/2019 12:14 PM] |
| LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: advising Dreka Scott is not part of the motion for summary judgment that you are appealing, and Henrick Kuiper was dismissed in the district court on 1/15/19 [19-60588] (MRW) [Entered: 09/09/2019 12:20 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. Awaiting ruling on ifp in district court. [9122996-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [19-60588] (CBW) [Entered: 08/16/2019 10:50 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Matthew Huskey [19-60588] (CBW) [Entered: 08/09/2019 10:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
