Lucinda Vine, et al v. PLS Financial Services, Inc., et al
| PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, KRISTY POND, on behalf of themselves and for all others similarly situated, PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED and LUCINDA VINE, on behalf of themselves and for all others similarly situated |
| 19-90010 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Daniel Raymond Dutko for Respondent Kristy Pond in 19-90010, Attorney Daniel Raymond Dutko for Respondent Lucinda Vine in 19-90010 [19-90010] (CAG) [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:45 PM] |
| Attorney Mr. Daniel Raymond Dutko for Respondents Ms. Lucinda Vine, Ms. Kristy Pond, Ms. Lucinda Vine and Ms. Kristy Pond is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: No signature on appearance form. [19-90010] (LBM) [Entered: 05/02/2019 09:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Daniel Raymond Dutko for Ms. Kristy Pond and Ms. Lucinda Vine for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-90010] (Daniel Raymond Dutko ) [Entered: 05/02/2019 05:01 PM] |
| COURT ORDER filed DENYING respondents' opposed motion to dismiss, as untimely, the motion for leave to appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners' opposed motion for leave to appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) is GRANTED. (IN DETAIL) [ # 9038731-2 ] [ # 9030614-2 ] [19-90010] (CAG) [Entered: 05/01/2019 11:18 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Daniel Raymond Dutko for Ms. Kristy Pond and Ms. Lucinda Vine for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-90010] (Daniel Raymond Dutko ) [Entered: 05/01/2019 04:53 PM] |
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to dismiss petition for permission to appeal [ # 9038731-2 ] filed by Respondents Ms. Kristy Pond and Ms. Lucinda Vine Date of Service: 04/26/2019 [19-90010] (CAG) [Entered: 04/29/2019 11:34 AM] |
| OPPOSED MOTION to dismiss petition for permission to appeal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) [9038731-2]. Date of service: 04/26/2019 [19-90010] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Respondents Ms. Kristy Pond and Ms. Lucinda Vine to dismiss the appeal [9038731-2]. Date of service: 04/26/2019 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Dutko, Higgins; Attorney for Petitioners: Irrobali, Patton, Tillotson [19-90010] (Daniel Raymond Dutko ) [Entered: 04/26/2019 06:33 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9031524-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-90010] (CAG) [Entered: 04/17/2019 11:27 AM] |
| OPPOSED MOTION filed by Petitioners PLS Financial Services, Incorporated and PLS Loan Store of Texas, Incorporated for permission to appeal [9030614-2] pursuant to Class Action Certification. Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/15/2019. Date of service: 04/15/2019 Response/Opposition due on 04/26/2019. [19-90010] (AS) [Entered: 04/16/2019 12:26 PM] |
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion for permission to appeal [ # 9030614-2 ] filed by Petitioners PLS Financial Services, Incorporated and PLS Loan Store of Texas, Incorporated [19-90010] (AS) [Entered: 04/16/2019 12:29 PM] |
| Attorney M. Mitchell Moss added as counsel of record for Respondents Lucinda Vine and Kristy Pond in 19-90010 [19-90010] (AS) [Entered: 04/16/2019 12:51 PM] |
| MISCELLANEOUS CASE docketed. [19-90010] (AS) [Entered: 04/16/2019 12:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lucinda Vine, et al v. PLS Financial Services, Inc., et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not yet classified: PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Mark Tillotson |
| Represented By: | J. Austen Irrobali |
| Represented By: | Jonathan R. Patton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not yet classified: KRISTY POND, on behalf of themselves and for all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Raymond Dutko |
| Represented By: | Howard Mark Burck |
| Represented By: | M. Mitchell Moss |
| Represented By: | Ryan Kees Higgins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not yet classified: PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Mark Tillotson |
| Represented By: | J. Austen Irrobali |
| Represented By: | Jonathan R. Patton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not yet classified: LUCINDA VINE, on behalf of themselves and for all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Raymond Dutko |
| Represented By: | Howard Mark Burck |
| Represented By: | M. Mitchell Moss |
| Represented By: | Ryan Kees Higgins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
