USA v. Pedro Ramos-Quezada
PEDRO RAMOS-QUEZADA |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-10037 |
January 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Taylor Wills Edwards Brown for party(s) Appellant Pedro Ramos-Quezada, in case 20-10037 [20-10037] (CB) [Entered: 01/14/2020 03:38 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10037] (Taylor Wills Edwards Brown ) [Entered: 01/14/2020 09:29 AM] |
DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Pedro Ramos-Quezada [20-10037] (CBW) [Entered: 01/13/2020 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Pedro Ramos-Quezada | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: PEDRO RAMOS-QUEZADA | |
Represented By: | Taylor Wills Edwards Brown |
Represented By: | George Howard Lancaster Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.