USA v. Jose Lara
JOSE GUADALUPE LARA, also known as Lupillo |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-10074 |
January 23, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9238624-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 02/27/2020 for Appellant Jose Guadalupe Lara to file unequivocal letter. [20-10074] (RSM) [Entered: 01/28/2020 07:52 AM] |
DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jose Guadalupe Lara [20-10074] (CAS) [Entered: 01/23/2020 10:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Jose Lara | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: JOSE GUADALUPE LARA, also known as Lupillo | |
Represented By: | Jose Guadalupe Lara |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.