Tyrone Williams v. Hunt County, TX Sheriff Dept, et al
| LIEUTENANT STROUD, Hunt County, Texas Sheriff Officer, NURSE ANGELA, Hunt County, Texas Sheriff Office Medical Officer, RANDY MEEKS, Hunt County, Texas Sheriff, TRANSPORT OFFICER ACKERS, HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS SHERIFF OFFICE CLASSIFICATION/ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, NURSE JANA, Hunt County, Texas Sheriff Department Head of the Medical Department, CAPTAIN SHERMAN, HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT LUNSFORD, Hunt County, Texas Sheriff Department Officer and SERGEANT MESSICK |
| TYRONE JAMAAL WILLIAMS |
| 20-10132 |
| February 5, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/17/2020 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Tyrone Jamaal Williams because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee deadline satisfied. Fee due on 04/23/2020 for Appellant Tyrone Jamaal Williams [20-10132] (CNF) [Entered: 03/24/2020 01:35 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:17-CV-3264. Electronic ROA due on 04/08/2020. [20-10132] (CNF) [Entered: 03/24/2020 01:52 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9249789-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 04/07/2020 for Appellant Tyrone Jamaal Williams [20-10132] (LEF) [Entered: 02/12/2020 09:14 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Tyrone Jamaal Williams [20-10132] (AS) [Entered: 02/05/2020 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.