USA v. Franklin Hudgens
| FRANKLIN LEE HUDGENS, also known as Tutu |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 20-10279 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [20-10279] (WMJ) [Entered: 03/16/2020 01:44 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9271640-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Motion to Withdraw, IFPPDC. [20-10279] (WMJ) [Entered: 03/16/2020 10:08 AM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Franklin Lee Hudgens [20-10279] (WMJ) [Entered: 03/13/2020 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Franklin Hudgens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: FRANKLIN LEE HUDGENS, also known as Tutu | |
| Represented By: | James Lee Bright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
