Shannon Boatwright v. Brenda Sadberry, et al
UT SOUTHWESTERN HOSPITAL, BRENDA SADBERRY, AARON ACUNA, MARCUS ALEXANDER, MICHAEL HARVEY, ANDREA PLUMLEE, Judge, GARLAND BEHAVIOR HEALTH, FRANCISCO NLN, VALENCIA ALEXENDRA, RICK SADBERRY, PARKLAND HOSPITAL, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICE(S), KEIRSTAN WASHINGTON, CPS, SHANAN MUNOZ, GARLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT and MARISSA NLN |
SHANNON BRIANNA BOATWRIGHT, Ms. |
20-10286 |
March 16, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
COURT ORDER: Here, there is no order or judgment entered on the district court docket as of the date indicated in plaintiff's notices of appeal. Further examnination of the district court's docket sheet shows no order that would be appealable. Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. (IN DETAIL) [9290954-2]. [20-10286] (CAS) [Entered: 04/13/2020 01:00 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-10286] (CAS) [Entered: 04/10/2020 06:45 AM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Oath of admission and consent to magistrate judge because only attorney's need to file oath of admission and consent to magistrate applies to the district court [20-10286] (CAS) [Entered: 04/02/2020 02:22 PM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9276102-2] NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Shannon Brianna Boatwright. [9276102-1] [20-10286] (AS) [Entered: 03/20/2020 11:49 AM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Shannon Brianna Boatwright [20-10286] (RSM) [Entered: 03/16/2020 11:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.