Joseph Hunter v. Douglas Schopmeyer, et al
| KATHLEEN WALSH, Public Defender, JENNIFER BENNETT, Judge, FAITH JOHNSON, Dallas County District Attorney, DOUGLAS HUGH SCHOPMEYER, Attorney of Law, KATHERINE A. DREW, Public Defender and GRACIE E. SHIN, Assistant District Attorney |
| JOSEPH WAYNE HUNTER |
| 20-10301 |
| March 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Wayne Hunter to extend time to pay filing fee [9300586-2]. [20-10301] (CNF) [Entered: 04/24/2020 02:38 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Wayne Hunter [ # 9300586-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 06/19/2020 for Appellant Joseph Wayne Hunter [20-10301] (CNF) [Entered: 04/24/2020 02:41 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9293041-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-10301] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/14/2020 02:51 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9288923-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Wayne Hunter. [9288923-1] [20-10301] (RSM) [Entered: 04/07/2020 03:02 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9281556-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 05/21/2020 for Appellant Joseph Wayne Hunter [20-10301] (CNF) [Entered: 03/27/2020 12:43 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Wayne Hunter [20-10301] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/19/2020 09:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
