Darryl Carter v. Dallas Police Department, et al
| A. HUGHS, Officer, In his official capacity, DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, D. AVERY, Officer, CITY OF DALLAS and CITY OF FORT WORTH |
| DARRYL CARTER |
| 20-10338 |
| March 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion for pacer access fee exemption because we are unable to determine the relief seeking. [20-10338] (MBC) [Entered: 05/06/2020 08:10 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Renewed motion for pacer access fee exemption received from Appellant Mr. Darryl Carter because duplicate - please see attached letter issued earlier regarding use of pay.gov [20-10338] (MBC) [Entered: 05/06/2020 02:37 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/26/2020 for Appellant Darryl Carter. [20-10338] (LEF) [Entered: 04/16/2020 02:05 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-10338] (LEF) [Entered: 04/16/2020 02:01 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9284481-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-10338] (CBW) [Entered: 04/01/2020 08:53 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:20-CV-259. Electronic ROA due on 04/16/2020. [20-10338] (CBW) [Entered: 04/01/2020 08:57 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Darryl Carter [20-10338] (CBW) [Entered: 03/27/2020 09:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
