Richard Barry v. Lowe's Home Centers, L.L.C.
| RICHARD E. BARRY |
| LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, L.L.C. |
| 20-10455 |
| May 11, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. SPECIAL ISSUES TO BE BRIEFED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/20/2020 for Appellant Richard E. Barry. [20-10455] (MAS) [Entered: 06/09/2020 01:29 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-10455] (MAS) [Entered: 06/09/2020 01:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Sarika Patel for party(s) Appellee Lowe's Home Centers, L.L.C., in case 20-10455 [20-10455] (CNF) [Entered: 06/03/2020 02:47 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney James Bauguss III for Appellant Richard E. Barry in 20-10455 [20-10455] (CNF) [Entered: 06/03/2020 02:49 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Melanie Kemp Okon for Appellee Lowe's Home Centers, L.L.C. in 20-10455 [20-10455] (CB) [Entered: 06/02/2020 02:04 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CV-872. Electronic ROA due on 06/17/2020. [20-10455] (CB) [Entered: 06/02/2020 01:08 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [20-10455] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Richard E. Barry advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 06/01/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Bauguss; Attorney for Appellee: Okon [20-10455] (James Bauguss III) [Entered: 06/01/2020 01:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10455] (James Bauguss III) [Entered: 06/01/2020 01:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10455] (Sarika Patel ) [Entered: 06/01/2020 09:40 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Melanie Kemp Okon for Lowe's Home Centers, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10455] (Melanie Kemp Okon ) [Entered: 05/29/2020 06:04 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: OK to Process with Special Issues to be Briefed. [9315647-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 06/02/2020 for Appellant Richard E. Barry [20-10455] (CAS) [Entered: 05/18/2020 04:44 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Richard E. Barry [20-10455] (RSM) [Entered: 05/11/2020 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Richard Barry v. Lowe's Home Centers, L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD E. BARRY | |
| Represented By: | James Bauguss III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Melanie Kemp Okon |
| Represented By: | Sarika Patel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
