USA v. Daniel Murillo
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL MURILLO
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 20-10473
Filed: May 15, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 9, 2021 USA v. Murillo

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2020 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/19/2020 The court appointed Melinda Lehmann to represent appellant on appeal. The appellant has now retained Steve Jumes to represent him on appeal. The court has apprised that Lehmann has not yet incurred any fees or costs in her representation of Murillo Transcript order due on 06/08/2020 for Appellant Daniel Murillo [20-10473] (MRW) [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:45 AM]
May 22, 2020 ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Melinda Lehmann is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:Murillo retaine counsel to represent him. [20-10473] (MRW) [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:46 AM]
May 22, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Steven Todd Jumes for party(s) Appellant Daniel Murillo, in case 20-10473 [20-10473] (MRW) [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:48 AM]
May 22, 2020 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [20-10473] (MRW) [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:48 AM]
May 20, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10473] (Steven Todd Jumes ) [Entered: 05/20/2020 05:05 PM]
May 20, 2020 Attorney Steven Jumes is advised to resubmit appearance form to include the complete address of law firm [20-10473] (LBM) [Entered: 05/20/2020 04:26 PM]
May 20, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10473] (Steven Todd Jumes ) [Entered: 05/20/2020 11:32 AM]
May 19, 2020 Attorney Steven James is advised to submit his motion using the proper filing event. [20-10473] (LBM) [Entered: 05/19/2020 03:51 PM]
May 19, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10473] (Steven Todd Jumes ) [Entered: 05/19/2020 01:58 PM]
May 18, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9314957-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 06/02/2020 for Appellant Daniel Murillo [20-10473] (MVM) [Entered: 05/18/2020 09:18 AM]
May 18, 2020 CJA APPOINTMENT for Attorney Ms. Melinda Joan Lehmann for Mr. Daniel Murillo. Counsel must use the eVoucher system to file the voucher at disposition of the case. Please see the attached document for further guidance. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: NTX ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 4:19-CR-362-11 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 11 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 05/13/2020 [20-10473] (MVM) [Entered: 05/18/2020 09:26 AM]
May 15, 2020 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Murillo [20-10473] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/15/2020 09:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Daniel Murillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: DANIEL MURILLO
Represented By: Steven Todd Jumes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Leigha Amy Simonton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?