Sue Richter v. Carnival Corporation
| SUE RICHTER |
| CARNIVAL CORPORATION and ROGER FRIZZELL |
| 20-10480 |
| May 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Sue Richter v. Carnival Corporation |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 08/10/2020 for Appellees Carnival Corporation and Roger Frizzell [20-10480] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Sue Richter. Date of service: 07/09/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bergman, Dameris, Hughes, Keltner, Weiner; Attorney for Appellant: Ramey [20-10480] (William Peterson Ramey III) [Entered: 07/09/2020 03:47 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-10480] (CMB) [Entered: 06/03/2020 04:27 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/13/2020 for Appellant Sue Richter. [20-10480] (CMB) [Entered: 06/03/2020 04:27 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Appellee Roger Frizzell added to case. Reason: Letter from attorney. [20-10480] (RSM) [Entered: 06/02/2020 10:18 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Roger Frizzell in 20-10480. Update: added as stated on appearance form. [20-10480] (RSM) [Entered: 06/02/2020 11:17 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Andrew David Bergman for party(s) Appellee Carnival Corporation, in case 20-10480 [20-10480] (CNF) [Entered: 05/29/2020 12:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David Weiner for party(s) Appellee Carnival Corporation, in case 20-10480, by Attorney David Weiner for Appellee Roger Frizzell in 20-10480 [20-10480] (RSM) [Entered: 06/02/2020 11:19 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jonathan W. Hughes for party(s) Appellee Roger Frizzell Appellee Carnival Corporation, in case 20-10480 [20-10480] (RSM) [Entered: 06/02/2020 11:26 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10480] (Andrew David Bergman ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 01:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10480] (David Weiner ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 01:33 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10480] (Jonathan W. Hughes ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 01:30 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:18-CV-2172. Electronic ROA due on 06/08/2020. [20-10480] (CNF) [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:56 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9318796-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-10480] (CNF) [Entered: 05/22/2020 11:52 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William Peterson Ramey III for Appellant Sue Richter in 20-10480 [20-10480] (RSM) [Entered: 05/20/2020 08:25 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney David E. Keltner for Appellee Carnival Corporation in 20-10480 [20-10480] (RSM) [Entered: 05/20/2020 08:09 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. David E. Keltner, Esq. for Carnival Corporation for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10480] (David E. Keltner ) [Entered: 05/19/2020 01:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William Peterson Ramey, III for Ms. Sue Richter for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10480] (William Peterson Ramey III) [Entered: 05/19/2020 02:20 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Sue Richter [20-10480] (AS) [Entered: 05/18/2020 12:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
