USA v. Robert Lopez-Parker
ROBERT JADE LOPEZ-PARKER |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-10490 |
May 20, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9317960-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 06/05/2020, for Appellant Robert Jade Lopez-Parker. [20-10490] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/21/2020 12:21 PM] |
DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Robert Jade Lopez-Parker [20-10490] (MFY) [Entered: 05/20/2020 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Robert Lopez-Parker | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: ROBERT JADE LOPEZ-PARKER | |
Represented By: | David E. Sloan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.