USA v. Timothy Tanner
TIMOTHY BERNARD TANNER |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-10506 |
May 28, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Leigha Amy Simonton for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10506] (Leigha Amy Simonton ) [Entered: 05/29/2020 09:04 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Amber Michelle Grand for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 20-10506 [20-10506] (RSM) [Entered: 05/29/2020 07:48 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Brian W. McKay for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 20-10506 [20-10506] (RSM) [Entered: 05/29/2020 07:44 AM] |
COURT ORDER denying Motion for a temporary administrative stay of the district court trial setting order until this court can resolve the appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner [ # 9322253-2 ] [20-10506] (MVM) [Entered: 05/29/2020 09:30 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Leigha Amy Simonton for Appellee USA in 20-10506 [20-10506] (CNF) [Entered: 05/29/2020 12:58 PM] |
COURT ACTION withdrawing Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction filed by Appellee USA [ # 9323226-2 ] [20-10506] (CAS) [Entered: 05/29/2020 04:04 PM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION to dismiss appeal without prejudice [9323407-2]. Date of service: 05/29/2020 [20-10506] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9323407-2]. Date of service: 05/29/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Grand, McKay, Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Wright [20-10506] (James Matthew Wright ) [Entered: 05/29/2020 03:18 PM] |
WITHDRAWN OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellee USA to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [9323226-2]. Date of service: 05/29/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Grand, McKay, Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Wright [20-10506] (Leigha Amy Simonton ) [Entered: 05/29/2020 01:30 PM] |
EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to stay district court proceedings [ # 9322253-2 ] Date of Service: 05/29/2020 [20-10506] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner Date of Service: 05/29/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Wright [20-10506] (James Matthew Wright ) [Entered: 05/29/2020 01:26 AM] |
REPLY filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner [9322646-1] to the Response/Opposition filed by Appellee USA [ # 9322635-2 ]. Date of Service: 05/29/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Wright. [20-10506] (James Matthew Wright ) [Entered: 05/29/2020 01:23 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10506] (Brian W. McKay ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 01:46 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10506] (Amber Michelle Grand ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 01:45 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9321898-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 06/12/2020 for Appellant Timothy Bernard Tanner [20-10506] (AS) [Entered: 05/28/2020 10:00 AM] |
OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner to stay district court proceedings [9322253-2] Ruling is requested by: 05/29/2020. Date of service: 05/28/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Wright [20-10506] (James Matthew Wright ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 02:00 PM] |
EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to stay district court proceedings [ # 9322253-2 ] Date of Service: 05/28/2020 [20-10506] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner Date of Service: 05/28/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Wright [20-10506] (James Matthew Wright ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 02:06 PM] |
RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by USA [9322635-1] to the Motion filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner [ # 9322253-2 ] Date of Service: 05/28/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Wright. [20-10506] (Leigha Amy Simonton ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 07:11 PM] |
LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner referencing Motion to stay district court proceedings filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner [ # 9322253-2 ]. Date of Service: 05/28/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Simonton; Attorney for Appellant: Wright [20-10506] (James Matthew Wright ) [Entered: 05/28/2020 04:52 PM] |
NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Timothy Bernard Tanner [20-10506] (AS) [Entered: 05/28/2020 09:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Timothy Tanner | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: TIMOTHY BERNARD TANNER | |
Represented By: | James Matthew Wright |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Amber Michelle Grand |
Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
Represented By: | Brian W. McKay Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.