Paul Timms v. Christian Douthit
CHRISTIAN DOUTHIT, Medical Doctor |
PAUL D. TIMMS |
20-10732 |
July 15, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Paul D. Timms. Fee deadline satisfied. [20-10732] (CNF) [Entered: 08/18/2020 09:26 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9362406-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 09/17/2020 for Appellant Paul D. Timms [20-10732] (CNF) [Entered: 07/24/2020 08:28 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Paul D. Timms [20-10732] (AS) [Entered: 07/15/2020 01:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Paul Timms v. Christian Douthit | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: CHRISTIAN DOUTHIT, Medical Doctor | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: PAUL D. TIMMS | |
Represented By: | Paul D. Timms |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.