Allen Robinson v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
| Allen Tyrone Robinson |
| Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 20-10745 |
| July 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Allen Tyrone Robinson. Extension Granted to and including 10/08/2020. Motion due deadline updated to 10/08/2020 for Appellant Allen Tyrone Robinson. Brief in Support deadline updated to 10/08/2020 for Appellant Allen Tyrone Robinson [20-10745] (CAS) [Entered: 09/15/2020 08:50 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Patrick Daniel Todd for Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 20-10745 [20-10745] (CNF) [Entered: 07/28/2020 03:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Patrick Daniel Todd for Ms. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10745] (Patrick Daniel Todd ) [Entered: 07/28/2020 02:12 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-10745] (MRW) [Entered: 07/28/2020 08:11 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9364198-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion due on 09/08/2020 for Appellant Allen Tyrone Robinson. Brief in Support due on 09/08/2020 for Appellant Allen Tyrone Robinson [20-10745] (CNF) [Entered: 07/27/2020 04:20 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-1022. Electronic ROA due on 08/11/2020. [20-10745] (CNF) [Entered: 07/27/2020 04:25 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Allen Tyrone Robinson [20-10745] (RSM) [Entered: 07/20/2020 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Allen Robinson v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Allen Tyrone Robinson | |
| Represented By: | Allen Tyrone Robinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Daniel Todd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Daniel Todd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
