Pete Garcia v. City of Amarillo, Texas
| Pete Garcia |
| City of Amarillo, Texas |
| 20-10780 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 10/22/2020 for Appellee City of Amarillo, Texas [20-10780] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Pete Garcia. Date of service: 09/22/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Chermel, Twing; Attorney for Appellees: Lynn, McWilliams, Schmidt [20-10780] (Shawn David Twing ) [Entered: 09/22/2020 09:17 PM] |
| RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require INSUFFICIENT FOR: EXCESS PAGES. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 10/07/2020 for Appellant Pete Garcia [20-10780] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Pete Garcia. Date of service: 09/22/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Chermel, Twing; Attorney for Appellees: Lynn, McWilliams, Schmidt [20-10780] (Shawn David Twing ) [Entered: 09/22/2020 11:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Bryan Scott McWilliams for Appellee City of Amarillo, Texas in 20-10780 [20-10780] (RSM) [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:24 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Leslie Spear Schmidt for party(s) Appellee City of Amarillo, Texas, in case 20-10780 [20-10780] (RSM) [Entered: 09/01/2020 07:28 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Bettye Lynn for Appellee City of Amarillo, Texas in 20-10780 [20-10780] (RSM) [Entered: 08/31/2020 08:04 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10780] (Leslie Spear Schmidt ) [Entered: 08/28/2020 04:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10780] (Bryan Scott McWilliams ) [Entered: 08/28/2020 06:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Bettye Lynn for City of Amarillo, Texas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10780] (Bettye Lynn ) [Entered: 08/28/2020 11:21 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Elizabeth Chermel for party(s) Appellant Pete Garcia, in case 20-10780 [20-10780] (RSM) [Entered: 08/24/2020 07:30 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-10780] (Elizabeth Chermel ) [Entered: 08/21/2020 09:43 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/22/2020 for Appellant Pete Garcia. [20-10780] (MRW) [Entered: 08/13/2020 11:24 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-10780] (MRW) [Entered: 08/13/2020 11:23 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Shawn David Twing for Appellant Pete Garcia in 20-10780 [20-10780] (RSM) [Entered: 08/12/2020 02:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Shawn David Twing, Esq. for Mr. Pete Garcia for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-10780] (Shawn David Twing ) [Entered: 08/11/2020 11:22 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9373008-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-10780] (CNF) [Entered: 08/07/2020 11:31 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:18-CV-95. Electronic ROA due on 08/24/2020. [20-10780] (CNF) [Entered: 08/07/2020 11:35 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Pete Garcia [20-10780] (MFY) [Entered: 07/31/2020 08:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
