Shannon Boatwright v. Brenda Sadberry, et al
UT Southwestern Hospital, Brenda Sadberry, Aaron Acuna, Marcus Alexander, Michael Harvey, Andrea Plumlee, Judge, Garland Behavior Health, Francisco NLN, Valencia Alexendra, Rick Sadberry, Parkland Hospital, Child Protective Service(s), Keirstan Washington, CPS, Shanan Munoz, Garland Police Department, Dallas Police Department and Marissa NLN |
Shannon Brianna Boatwright, Ms. |
20-10810 |
August 11, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Ms. Shannon Brianna Boatwright. Extension Granted to and including 11/12/2020. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 11/12/2020 for Appellant Shannon Brianna Boatwright [20-10810] (MVM) [Entered: 09/11/2020 12:33 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/13/2020 for Appellant Shannon Brianna Boatwright. [20-10810] (MRW) [Entered: 09/02/2020 07:46 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-10810] (MRW) [Entered: 09/02/2020 07:46 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-43. Electronic ROA due on 09/02/2020. [20-10810] (RSM) [Entered: 08/18/2020 09:54 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9379883-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-10810] (RSM) [Entered: 08/18/2020 09:51 AM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Shannon Brianna Boatwright [20-10810] (LEF) [Entered: 08/11/2020 10:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.