Continental Automt Sys, Inc. v. Avanci, L.L.C., et al
| Avanci, L.L.C., a Delaware corporation, Optis Cellular Technology, L.L.C., a Delaware corporation, Avanci Platform International Limited, an Irish company, Nokia Corporation, a Finnish corporation, Nokia Technologies Oy, a Finnish corporation, Optis UP Holdings, L.L.C., a Delaware corporation, Nokia of America Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Sharp Corporation, a Japanese corporation, Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, a Finnish corporation, Optis Wireless Technology, L.L.C., a Delaware Corporation, Nokia Solutions and Networks U.S., L.L.C., a Delaware corporation and Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL, a Luxembourg corporation |
| Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation |
| 20-11032 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Continental Automotive Systems v. Avanci, LLC
|
| Cntntl Auto Sys v. Avanci, L.L.C. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated. Extension Granted to and including 01/22/2021. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 01/22/2021 for Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/25/2020 08:25 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated for filing Appellent's Brief until 01/22/2021 [20-11032] (Matthew Holder ) [Entered: 11/24/2020 07:21 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/28/2020 for Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated. [20-11032] (MRW) [Entered: 11/16/2020 10:32 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-11032] (MRW) [Entered: 11/16/2020 10:31 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Theodore J. Angelis for party(s) Appellee Sharp Corporation, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/13/2020 02:40 PM] |
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Ben Bernell is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:no longer working on this case. [20-11032] (CBW) [Entered: 11/12/2020 11:30 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11032] (Theodore J. Angelis ) [Entered: 11/10/2020 12:21 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jennifer Klein Ayers for Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated in 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/09/2020 10:41 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney James Granger Kress for Appellee Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL in 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/05/2020 01:10 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 11/05/2020 via US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Ayers; Attorney for Appellee: Kao; email - Attorney for Appellants: Bader, Holder, Scarborough, Solouki, Vogel; Attorney for Appellees: Badini, Kessler, Kress, Opdyke, Papendick, Sheasby, Stevenson, Tautfest, Torpey, Tuck, Zhong [20-11032] (Matthew Holder ) [Entered: 11/05/2020 11:31 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Susannah P. Torpey for party(s) Appellee Avanci, L.L.C. Appellee Avanci Platform International Limited, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/05/2020 10:40 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Ian L. Papendick for Appellee Avanci Platform International Limited in 20-11032, Attorney Ian L. Papendick for Appellee Avanci, L.L.C. in 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/05/2020 01:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Ingrid Marie Haslund Petersen for party(s) Appellee Optis Wireless Technology, L.L.C. Appellee Optis Cellular Technology, L.L.C. Appellee Optis UP Holdings, L.L.C., in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/05/2020 04:02 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:19-CV-2933. Electronic ROA due on 11/20/2020. [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/05/2020 01:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Benjamin L. Bernell for party(s) Appellee Sharp Corporation, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/05/2020 04:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Stephen Sandor Korniczky for party(s) Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/05/2020 04:26 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Ian L. Papendick for Avanci Platform International Limited and Avanci, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Ian L. Papendick ) [Entered: 11/04/2020 09:01 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Hong Annita Zhong for party(s) Appellee Optis Wireless Technology, L.L.C. Appellee Optis Cellular Technology, L.L.C. Appellee Optis UP Holdings, L.L.C., in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (RSM) [Entered: 11/04/2020 08:48 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Patrick S. Opdyke for party(s) Appellee Avanci, L.L.C. Appellee Avanci Platform International Limited, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (RSM) [Entered: 11/04/2020 09:03 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11032] (Benjamin L. Bernell ) [Entered: 11/04/2020 02:26 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Aldo A. Badini for party(s) Appellee Avanci, L.L.C. Appellee Avanci Platform International Limited, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (RSM) [Entered: 11/04/2020 08:25 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Stephen Sandor Korniczky ) [Entered: 11/04/2020 02:05 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Ingrid Marie Haslund Petersen ) [Entered: 11/04/2020 11:52 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jeffrey L. Kessler for party(s) Appellee Avanci, L.L.C. Appellee Avanci Platform International Limited, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (RSM) [Entered: 11/04/2020 08:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Martin Bader for party(s) Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/03/2020 01:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Hong Annita Zhong ) [Entered: 11/03/2020 02:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael Scarborough for party(s) Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/03/2020 01:49 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Holder for party(s) Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/03/2020 01:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Mona Solouki for party(s) Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/03/2020 01:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Andrew Jacob Tuck for party(s) Appellee Nokia of America Corporation Appellee Nokia Technologies Oy Appellee Nokia Solutions and Networks U.S., L.L.C. Appellee Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy Appellee Nokia Corporation, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/03/2020 02:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Karin Dougan Vogel for party(s) Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated, in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 11/03/2020 01:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. James Granger Kress for Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11032] (James Granger Kress ) [Entered: 11/03/2020 05:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Susannah P. Torpey ) [Entered: 11/03/2020 04:57 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Patrick S. Opdyke ) [Entered: 11/03/2020 03:33 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Aldo A. Badini ) [Entered: 11/03/2020 03:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11032] (Jeffrey L. Kessler ) [Entered: 11/03/2020 03:25 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Michael Scarborough ) [Entered: 11/02/2020 01:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Andrew Jacob Tuck ) [Entered: 11/02/2020 12:49 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Mona Solouki ) [Entered: 11/02/2020 01:50 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11032] (Matthew Holder ) [Entered: 11/02/2020 01:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Karin Dougan Vogel ) [Entered: 11/02/2020 01:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Jennifer Ayers ) [Entered: 11/02/2020 01:57 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11032] (Martin Bader ) [Entered: 11/02/2020 01:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jason G. Sheasby for party(s) Appellee Optis Wireless Technology, L.L.C. Appellee Optis Cellular Technology, L.L.C. Appellee Optis UP Holdings, L.L.C., in case 20-11032 [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 10/29/2020 12:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11032] (Jason G. Sheasby ) [Entered: 10/28/2020 05:49 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9425835-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 11/05/2020 for Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated [20-11032] (MFY) [Entered: 10/21/2020 11:49 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated [20-11032] (CBW) [Entered: 10/15/2020 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
