USA v. Herrera
| Jonathon Herrera, also known as Jonathon Herrera-Obregon |
| United States of America |
| 20-11060 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to file motion for Certificate of Appealability out of time filed by Appellant Mr. Jonathon Herrera [ # 9458411-3 ] [20-11060] (LLL) [Entered: 12/10/2020 08:11 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jonathon Herrera for certificate of appealability [9460076-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [20-11060] (LLL) [Entered: 12/10/2020 08:15 AM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Jonathon Herrera in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9460076-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9460083-1] [20-11060] (LLL) [Entered: 12/10/2020 08:19 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Patrick Allen Mullin for Appellant Jonathon Herrera in 20-11060 [20-11060] (CNF) [Entered: 12/10/2020 08:49 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11060] (Patrick Allen Mullin ) [Entered: 12/08/2020 03:18 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jonathon Herrera for certificate of appealability [9458411-2] , to file out of time motion [9458411-3] to Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Date of service: 12/08/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Mullin; Attorney for Appellee: Simonton [20-11060] (Patrick Allen Mullin ) [Entered: 12/08/2020 12:34 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Jonathon Herrera in 20-11060. [20-11060] (MBC) [Entered: 11/02/2020 12:22 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-11060] (CMB) [Entered: 11/02/2020 10:42 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9428753-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-11060] (RSM) [Entered: 10/26/2020 08:48 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-460. Electronic ROA due on 11/10/2020. [20-11060] (RSM) [Entered: 10/26/2020 08:53 AM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 12/07/2020 for Appellant Jonathon Herrera. Brief in Support due on 12/07/2020 for Appellant Jonathon Herrera [20-11060] (RSM) [Entered: 10/26/2020 09:00 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jonathon Herrera [20-11060] (MBC) [Entered: 10/21/2020 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Herrera | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Jonathon Herrera, also known as Jonathon Herrera-Obregon | |
| Represented By: | Jonathon Herrera |
| Represented By: | Patrick Allen Mullin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Leigha Amy Simonton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
