Siplast v. Employers Mtl Cas
Plaintiff / Appellant: Siplast, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellee: Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Case Number: 20-11076
Filed: October 23, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 11, 2022 Summary Siplast, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11076] (Brett David Kutnick ) [Entered: 12/04/2020 11:25 AM]
December 4, 2020 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Siplast, Incorporated. Extension Granted to and including 01/27/2021. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 01/27/2021 for Appellant Siplast, Incorporated [20-11076] (CBW) [Entered: 12/04/2020 12:48 PM]
December 4, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Brett David Kutnick for party(s) Appellant Siplast, Incorporated, in case 20-11076 [20-11076] (LLL) [Entered: 12/04/2020 04:15 PM]
November 16, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-11076] (MRW) [Entered: 11/16/2020 11:49 AM]
November 16, 2020 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/28/2020 for Appellant Siplast, Incorporated. [20-11076] (MRW) [Entered: 11/16/2020 11:50 AM]
November 11, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Christopher Andrew Thompson for Appellant Siplast, Incorporated in 20-11076 [20-11076] (LLL) [Entered: 11/11/2020 11:56 AM]
November 9, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11076] (Christopher Andrew Thompson ) [Entered: 11/09/2020 03:16 PM]
November 2, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:19-CV-1320. Electronic ROA due on 11/17/2020. [20-11076] (LLL) [Entered: 11/02/2020 04:55 PM]
November 2, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9434018-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-11076] (LLL) [Entered: 11/02/2020 04:53 PM]
October 27, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kevin Graham Cain for party(s) Appellee Employers Mutual Casualty Company, in case 20-11076 [20-11076] (LLL) [Entered: 10/27/2020 04:46 PM]
October 26, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11076] (Kevin Graham Cain ) [Entered: 10/26/2020 03:50 PM]
October 23, 2020 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Siplast, Incorporated [20-11076] (MVM) [Entered: 10/23/2020 04:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Siplast v. Employers Mtl Cas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Siplast, Incorporated
Represented By: Christopher Andrew Thompson
Represented By: Brett David Kutnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Represented By: Kevin Graham Cain Esq.
Represented By: Christopher Weldon Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?