Rainey v. Thomason
| Stephen R. Herod, 91st District Court Judge, Sherry Williamson, Sara Adams, Asst. District Attorney 91st District Court, Tessa Culverhouse, 91st District Court Clerk, Phillip Gregory, Tim Copeland, Russell D. Thomason, District Attorney 91st District Court and County of Eastland Texas |
| William Len Rainey |
| 20-11265 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the notice of withdraw of notice of appeal received from Appellant Mr. William Len Rainey in light of the court's order of February 4, 2021 dismissing the appeal pursuant to FRAP 42 (form 1 - motion to dismiss appeal was received. 02/02/2021) [20-11265] (CNF) [Entered: 02/08/2021 09:12 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. William Len Rainey [ # 9495115-2 ] [20-11265] (CNF) [Entered: 02/04/2021 08:12 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. William Len Rainey to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9495115-2]. [20-11265] (CNF) [Entered: 02/02/2021 11:18 AM] |
| LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: GO-2021-3 notice sent [20-11265] (CAS) [Entered: 01/26/2021 02:05 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved ( PLRA Case with Possible Juris Problem, Return after Fee is Resolved. Additional Comment: NF civil) [9478803-2] Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 03/08/2021 for Appellant William Len Rainey. Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-11265] (CNF) [Entered: 01/11/2021 08:17 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. William Len Rainey [20-11265] (MFY) [Entered: 12/30/2020 03:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
