Philadelphia Indemnity Ins v. Reytech Services
| Reytech Services, L.L.C. |
| Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company |
| 20-11274 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Philadelphia Indemnity v. Reytech |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Vincent Paul Circelli for Appellant Reytech Services, L.L.C. in 20-11274 [20-11274] (MBC) [Entered: 01/18/2021 01:36 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kelli Walter for party(s) Appellant Reytech Services, L.L.C., in case 20-11274 [20-11274] (MBC) [Entered: 01/18/2021 04:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11274] (Kelli Walter ) [Entered: 01/15/2021 09:46 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Ryan D. Dry for Appellee Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company in 20-11274 [20-11274] (CBW) [Entered: 01/15/2021 12:13 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Steven Kyle Cannon for party(s) Appellee Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, in case 20-11274 [20-11274] (CBW) [Entered: 01/15/2021 12:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Vincent Paul Circelli for Reytech Services, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11274] (Vincent Paul Circelli ) [Entered: 01/14/2021 04:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-11274] (Steven Kyle Cannon ) [Entered: 01/14/2021 12:27 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-11274] (CMB) [Entered: 01/14/2021 10:18 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/23/2021 for Appellant Reytech Services, L.L.C.. [20-11274] (CMB) [Entered: 01/14/2021 10:19 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Ryan D. Dry for Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-11274] (Ryan D. Dry ) [Entered: 01/14/2021 12:25 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9479039-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-11274] (CBW) [Entered: 01/11/2021 10:13 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-211. Electronic ROA due on 01/26/2021. [20-11274] (CBW) [Entered: 01/11/2021 10:56 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Reytech Services, L.L.C. [20-11274] (RAJ) [Entered: 12/31/2020 04:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Philadelphia Indemnity Ins v. Reytech Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Reytech Services, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Vincent Paul Circelli |
| Represented By: | Kelli Walter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Ryan D. Dry |
| Represented By: | Steven Kyle Cannon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
