Donald Calhoun v. Jack Doheny Companies, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff / Appellee: DONALD CALHOUN
Case Number: 20-20068
Filed: February 14, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 7, 2020 Summary Calhoun v. Jack Doheny Companies, Inc.
August 28, 2020 Summary Donald Calhoun v. Jack Doheny Companies, Inc.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2020 CASE TENTATIVELY calendared for oral argument for the week of 06/01/2020. [20-20068] (GAM) [Entered: 03/31/2020 10:14 AM]
March 30, 2020 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied [20-20068] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated. Date of service: 03/30/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cronkhite; Attorney for Appellees: Nguyen, Rosenberg [20-20068] (R.J. Cronkhite ) [Entered: 03/30/2020 02:08 PM]
March 30, 2020 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. [20-20068] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated. Date of service: 03/30/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cronkhite; Attorney for Appellees: Nguyen, Rosenberg [20-20068] (R.J. Cronkhite ) [Entered: 03/30/2020 02:11 PM]
March 18, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Gregg M. Rosenberg for Appellee Donald Calhoun in 20-20068 [20-20068] (JMW) [Entered: 03/18/2020 07:35 AM]
March 18, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Renee Nguyen for party(s) Appellee Donald Calhoun, in case 20-20068 [20-20068] (JMW) [Entered: 03/18/2020 07:37 AM]
March 18, 2020 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. EXPEDITED SCHEDULE. A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/30/2020 for Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated.. Appellee's Brief due on 04/14/2020 for Appellee Donald Calhoun.. Reply Brief due on 04/29/2020 for Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated. [20-20068] (DMS) [Entered: 03/18/2020 11:09 AM]
March 18, 2020 COURT ORDER filed that Appellant's unopposed motion to expedite the appeal is GRANTED. [ # 9272516-2 ] [20-20068] (DMS) [Entered: 03/18/2020 11:02 AM]
March 17, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney R.J. Cronkhite for Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated in 20-20068 [20-20068] (DMS) [Entered: 03/17/2020 03:17 PM]
March 17, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-20068] (Renee Nguyen ) [Entered: 03/17/2020 02:56 PM]
March 17, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Gregg M. Rosenberg, Esq. for Mr. Donald Calhoun for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20068] (Gregg M. Rosenberg ) [Entered: 03/17/2020 02:53 PM]
March 17, 2020 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated to expedite the appeal [9272516-2]. Date of service: 03/17/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cronkhite; Attorney for Appellee: Rosenberg [20-20068] (R.J. Cronkhite ) [Entered: 03/17/2020 09:30 AM]
March 16, 2020 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. R.J. Cronkhite, Esq. for Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20068] (R.J. Cronkhite ) [Entered: 03/16/2020 02:38 PM]
March 5, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20068] (DDL) [Entered: 03/05/2020 03:38 PM]
March 5, 2020 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/14/2020 for Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated. [20-20068] (DDL) [Entered: 03/05/2020 03:38 PM]
March 3, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9262692-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 03/18/2020 for Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated [20-20068] (DMS) [Entered: 03/03/2020 10:38 AM]
March 3, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:19-CV-3171. Electronic ROA due on 03/18/2020. [20-20068] (DMS) [Entered: 03/03/2020 01:23 PM]
February 25, 2020 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [20-20068] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 02/25/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cronkhite; Attorney for Appellee: Rosenberg [20-20068] (R.J. Cronkhite ) [Entered: 02/25/2020 01:45 PM]
February 14, 2020 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Jack Doheny Companies, Incorporated [20-20068] (ABT) [Entered: 02/14/2020 12:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Donald Calhoun v. Jack Doheny Companies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INCORPORATED
Represented By: R.J. Cronkhite Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: DONALD CALHOUN
Represented By: Gregg M. Rosenberg Esq.
Represented By: Renee Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?