Manuel Mendoza v. Fred Haas Motors, Limited
| MANUEL MENDOZA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| FRED HAAS MOTORS, LIMITED, a Texas Corporation |
| 20-20123 |
| March 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Manuel Mendoza v. Fred Haas Motors, Limited |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Fred Haas Motors, Limited. Extension Granted to and including 06/03/2020. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/03/2020 for Appellant Fred Haas Motors, Limited [20-20123] (SDH) [Entered: 04/28/2020 02:45 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Fred Haas Motors, Limited for filing Brief of Appellant until 06/03/2020 [20-20123] (Christopher Dove ) [Entered: 04/28/2020 02:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Christopher Dove for party(s) Appellant Fred Haas Motors, Limited, in case 20-20123 [20-20123] (SDH) [Entered: 03/24/2020 10:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20123] (Joshua R. Levine ) [Entered: 03/24/2020 02:25 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Joshua R. Levine for party(s) Appellee Manuel Mendoza, in case 20-20123 [20-20123] (SDH) [Entered: 03/24/2020 03:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20123] (Christopher Dove ) [Entered: 03/23/2020 04:57 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/04/2020 for Appellant Fred Haas Motors, Limited. [20-20123] (DDL) [Entered: 03/23/2020 08:30 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20123] (DDL) [Entered: 03/23/2020 08:29 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9272759-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-20123] (SDH) [Entered: 03/17/2020 11:39 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:19-CV-4119. Electronic ROA due on 04/01/2020. [20-20123] (SDH) [Entered: 03/17/2020 11:49 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Fred Haas Motors, Limited in 20-20123. Update: the party text was edited. [20-20123] (ABT) [Entered: 03/11/2020 01:34 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Fred Haas Motors, Limited [20-20123] (ABT) [Entered: 03/10/2020 09:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Manuel Mendoza v. Fred Haas Motors, Limited | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: MANUEL MENDOZA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Gary M. Klinger |
| Represented By: | Andrew Shamis |
| Represented By: | Joshua R. Levine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: FRED HAAS MOTORS, LIMITED, a Texas Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Kurt Lance Krolikowski |
| Represented By: | Christopher Dove Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
