Ronald Dracos v. Ed Gonzalez
| RONALD THOMAS DRACOS |
| LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and Ed Gonzalez |
| 20-20297 |
| June 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Thomas Dracos in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9361133-2 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. Date of Service: 07/14/2020. [9361136-1] [20-20297] (DLM) [Entered: 07/22/2020 02:31 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Thomas Dracos for certificate of appealability [9361133-2]. Date of service: 07/14/2020 Motion due deadline satisfied. [20-20297] (DLM) [Entered: 07/22/2020 02:30 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Notice to Clerk of Court referring to the respondent not being Lorie Davis and request for a copy of the docket sheet received from Appellant Mr. Ronald Thomas Dracos. The respondent in the appeal has already been corrected with notice having been issued of this on 7/10/20. To purchase a copy of the 4 pg. docket sheet, the cost is $2.00. [20-20297] (DLM) [Entered: 07/17/2020 01:59 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20297] (CMB) [Entered: 07/14/2020 10:28 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 20-20297 substituted by Appellee Ed Gonzalez in 20-20297 [20-20297] (ABT) [Entered: 07/10/2020 01:06 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion for Extension in Filing received from Appellant Mr. Ronald Thomas Dracos because it crossed in the mail with the notice issued on 7/6/20 (BR 7) directing the filing of a COA. The enclosed motion advises that a 2241 habeas petition was initially filed, not a 2254 petition. Having confirmed the filing, the caption for the appeal has been updated to remove Lorie Davis, and reflect Ed Gonzalez as the respondent in this Federal Habeas Case. Despite this correction however, a COA will still be required in order to proceed. A corrected caption is enclosed. [20-20297] (DLM) [Entered: 07/10/2020 01:36 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Appellant's Opening Brief received from Appellant Mr. Ronald Thomas Dracos because a brief of the merits of the appeal is premature at this time. The brief has also crossed in the mail with the court's notice directing the filing of COA documents. [20-20297] (DLM) [Entered: 07/09/2020 11:54 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/25/2020 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Ronald Thomas Dracos.Fee deadline satisfied [20-20297] (JMW) [Entered: 07/06/2020 01:16 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 08/17/2020 for Appellant Ronald Thomas Dracos. Brief in Support due on 08/17/2020 for Appellant Ronald Thomas Dracos [20-20297] (JMW) [Entered: 07/06/2020 01:17 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-1400. Electronic ROA due on 07/21/2020. [20-20297] (JMW) [Entered: 07/06/2020 01:22 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9334145-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 06/30/2020 for Appellant Ronald Thomas Dracos [20-20297] (JMW) [Entered: 06/15/2020 02:05 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Thomas Dracos [20-20297] (ABT) [Entered: 06/09/2020 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
