James Ernst v. Methodist Hospital System
| JAMES ERNST |
| METHODIST HOSPITAL SYSTEM |
| 20-20321 |
| June 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:18-CV-766. Electronic ROA due on 07/10/2020. [20-20321] (JMW) [Entered: 06/25/2020 11:29 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9342087-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-20321] (JMW) [Entered: 06/25/2020 11:27 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. James Ernst [20-20321] (SDH) [Entered: 06/19/2020 02:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Ernst v. Methodist Hospital System | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES ERNST | |
| Represented By: | Ellen Sprovach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: METHODIST HOSPITAL SYSTEM | |
| Represented By: | Daniel F. Patton Esq. |
| Represented By: | Michael W. Twomey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.