Matthew Leachman v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
MATTHEW JAMES LEACHMAN |
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
20-20323 |
June 22, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20323] (MRW) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:45 AM] |
LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 08/24/2020 for Appellant Matthew James Leachman. Brief in Support due on 08/24/2020 for Appellant Matthew James Leachman [20-20323] (MRW) [Entered: 07/15/2020 09:49 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:18-CV-544. Electronic ROA due on 07/30/2020. [20-20323] (MRW) [Entered: 07/15/2020 09:52 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/04/2020 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Matthew James Leachman. [20-20323] (MRW) [Entered: 07/15/2020 09:49 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Matthew James Leachman advising transcript unnecessary (No Hearings) [20-20323] (MRW) [Entered: 07/15/2020 09:47 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Nathan Tadema for party(s) Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 20-20323 [20-20323] (SDH) [Entered: 07/02/2020 11:58 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Nathan Tadema for Ms. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20323] (Nathan Tadema ) [Entered: 07/01/2020 12:45 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9345562-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (Motion for IFP pending dc) [20-20323] (SDH) [Entered: 06/30/2020 11:35 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Matthew James Leachman [20-20323] (JMW) [Entered: 06/22/2020 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Matthew Leachman v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: MATTHEW JAMES LEACHMAN | |
Represented By: | Matthew James Leachman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
Represented By: | Nathan Tadema |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
Represented By: | Nathan Tadema |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.