Antonio McGee v. Art Acevedo
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONIO Q MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee: ART ACEVEDO, Chief of Polica
Case Number: 20-20350
Filed: July 6, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 3, 2021 McGee v. Acevedo

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-2170. Electronic ROA due on 09/18/2020. [20-20350] (DLM) [Entered: 09/03/2020 10:27 AM]
August 31, 2020 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the 8/25/20 Declaration and Correspondence in response to the notice requesting an inmate trust fund statement received from Appellant Mr. Antonio Q McGee. Advising that the trust fund statement included with the motion to appoint counsel, will also be used for the IFP motion filed under a claim of imminent danger. Once ruled on, he will be advised accordingly [20-20350] (DLM) [Entered: 09/03/2020 10:03 AM]
August 17, 2020 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Q McGee in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA (UNDER CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER DUE TO COVID !9) [ # 9380464-2 ]. Date of Service: 08/10/2020. [9380480-1] [20-20350] (DLM) [Entered: 08/18/2020 03:15 PM]
August 17, 2020 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Q McGee to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) UNDER CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER DUE TO COVID 19 (INCORPORATED WITH THE BRIEF IN SUPPORT) [9380464-2] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 09/02/2020 for Appellant Antonio Q McGee. Date of service: 08/10/2020 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs an inmate trust fund statement. [20-20350] (DLM) [Entered: 08/18/2020 03:07 PM]
July 31, 2020 3 STRIKES case. [20-20350] (DLM) [Entered: 07/31/2020 11:20 AM]
July 31, 2020 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/27/2020 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Antonio Q McGee because he is a 3 striker. Fee due on 08/17/2020 for Appellant Antonio Q McGee [20-20350] (DLM) [Entered: 07/31/2020 11:10 AM]
July 28, 2020 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Q McGee to appoint counsel [9367966-2]. Date of service: 07/21/2020 [20-20350] (DLM) [Entered: 07/31/2020 11:16 AM]
July 16, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9356879-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 09/09/2020 for Appellant Antonio Q McGee [20-20350] (CAG) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:58 AM]
July 6, 2020 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Antonio Q McGee [20-20350] (JMW) [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Antonio McGee v. Art Acevedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ANTONIO Q MCGEE
Represented By: Antonio Q. McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ART ACEVEDO, Chief of Polica
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?