Herbert Hay v. TDCJ-CID, et al
| Lanette Linthicum, TDCJ-Correctional Institutional Division, Lorie Davis, Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice, John White, Maintenance Supervisor, Robert Herrera, Warden, Paul Wilder, Warden, John Shelby, Safety Officer and Dianna Thomas, Certified Medication Aide |
| Herbert Darrell Hay, also known as Michael Darnell Noe, also known as Mike Noe, also known as Debbie Noe |
| 20-20385 |
| July 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. Herbert Darrell Hay [ # 9375023-2 ] [20-20385] (MRW) [Entered: 08/11/2020 01:21 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Herbert Darrell Hay to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9375023-2]. [20-20385] (MRW) [Entered: 08/11/2020 01:19 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9365287-2] [20-20385] Additional appeal docketed 7/27/20 (JMW) [Entered: 07/28/2020 03:40 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9365271-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [20-20385] IFPPDC (JMW) [Entered: 07/28/2020 03:32 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9364288-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Herbert Darrell Hay. [9364288-1] [20-20385] (ABT) [Entered: 07/27/2020 06:59 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Herbert Darrell Hay [20-20385] (CAG) [Entered: 07/21/2020 08:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
