Alexander Ascencio v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director
Alexander Ascencio |
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
20-20502 |
September 28, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Alexander Ascencio for certificate of appealability [9445907-2]. Date of service: 11/12/2020 Motion due deadline satisfied. [20-20502] (DLM) [Entered: 11/18/2020 04:26 PM] |
BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Alexander Ascencio in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9445907-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. Date of Service: 11/12/2020. [9445912-1] [20-20502] (DLM) [Entered: 11/18/2020 04:26 PM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion for IFP and duplicative Notice of Appeal received from Appellant Mr. Alexander Ascencio together with his COA document, because both are unnecessary. The appeal is already proceeding IFP and the notice of appeal is duplative of the one already on file. COA documents included have been filed. [20-20502] (DLM) [Entered: 11/18/2020 04:29 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. [20-20502] (MRW) [Entered: 11/09/2020 01:27 PM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/04/2020 granting IFP and denying COA for Appellant Mr. Alexander Ascencio. Motion due on 12/21/2020 for Appellant Alexander Ascencio. Brief in Support due on 12/21/2020 for Appellant Alexander Ascencio [20-20502] (MRW) [Entered: 11/09/2020 01:05 PM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Alexander Ascencio in 20-20502. Update: Party information entered incorrectly at case opening. [20-20502] (CBW) [Entered: 10/08/2020 11:17 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Lori Denise Brodbeck for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 20-20502 [20-20502] (ABT) [Entered: 10/08/2020 11:04 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20502] (Lori Denise Brodbeck ) [Entered: 10/07/2020 01:13 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9413915-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [20-20502] (CBW) [Entered: 10/05/2020 12:22 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Alexander Ascencio [20-20502] (CBW) [Entered: 09/28/2020 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Alexander Ascencio v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Alexander Ascencio | |
Represented By: | Alexander Ascencio |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
Represented By: | Lori Denise Brodbeck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.