Kenneth Sowell v. Mark Barber, et al
| Niya W. Collins, John Doe, nurse, Chancy Sessions, Robert Gundek, Tawn A. Kent, Betty J. Williams, John Doe, nurse, State of Texas, at the Texas Department of Corrections, Carla Bayliff, Mark A. Barber, doctor, the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections, Estelle Medical Department, Desire Ivey, Patricia Burnett, John Doe, nurse, State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections, Ramon Saucedo, Doctor for the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections and Betty J. Williams, Doctor for the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections |
| Kenneth Sowell |
| 20-20519 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20519] (SDH) [Entered: 11/11/2020 01:29 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Betty J. Williams in 20-20519. [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 11/10/2020 01:27 PM] |
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9431700-2 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Sowell [20-20519] (MRW) [Entered: 11/03/2020 02:39 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:18-CV-4499. Electronic ROA due on 11/12/2020. [20-20519] (DLM) [Entered: 10/28/2020 04:26 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/09/2020 denying the Motion to Alter or Amend Judgement (#81) ; Motions for IFP (#79 and 86); and Motion for Extension of Time (#83) . [20-20519] (DLM) [Entered: 10/28/2020 04:21 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Sowell to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) UNDER CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER. [9431700-2]. Date of service: 10/21/2020 [20-20519] (DLM) [Entered: 10/28/2020 04:25 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for motion to alter or amend judgment (#81). [9417843-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 10/09/2020 09:42 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for motion to alter or amend judgment (#81) for additional appeal. [9417847-2] [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 10/09/2020 09:44 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for John Doe, nurse in 20-20519., Appellee John Doe added to case. [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 10/05/2020 09:21 AM] |
| 3 STRIKES case. [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 10/02/2020 12:02 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9413040-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Sowell. [9413040-1] [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 10/02/2020 01:13 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Appellees John Doe, nurse, John Doe, nurse, State of Texas, John Doe, nurse, State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections, John Doe, Betty J. Williams, Ramon Saucedo, Estelle Medical Department, Tawn A. Kent, Chancy Sessions, Desire Ivey, Patricia Burnett, Carla Bayliff, Robert Gundek and Niya W. Collins added to case. Reason: inadvertently omitted at case opening. [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 10/02/2020 02:03 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Kenneth Sowell in 20-20519. Update: inadvertently omitted at case opening. [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 10/02/2020 02:05 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kenneth Sowell [20-20519] (CAG) [Entered: 10/02/2020 11:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
