Tyler v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Michael Tyler
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 20-20555
Filed: October 26, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2020 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Tyler for certificate of appealability [9461209-2]. Date of service: 12/07/2020 Motion due deadline satisfied. [20-20555] (DLM) [Entered: 12/11/2020 10:48 AM]
December 10, 2020 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Tyler in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9461209-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. Date of Service: 12/07/2020. [9461211-1] [20-20555] (DLM) [Entered: 12/11/2020 10:49 AM]
November 17, 2020 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: While it is not the policy of this court to provide complimentary copies of documents, we are enclosing a copy of the four page brief previously received on 11/12/20 this one time only as requested and will take no further action on it. [20-20555] (DLM) [Entered: 11/17/2020 01:36 PM]
November 12, 2020 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Brief Supporting Application 2253 which we view as a motion for COA received from Appellant Mr. Michael Tyler because the document is dated 9/7/20, which is prior to the date of the order being appealed. Allowing the opportunity to advise if this is intended for filing in this appeal and to further advise if it is both a motion and brief in support of COA which is currently due 12/14/20. [20-20555] (DLM) [Entered: 11/12/2020 02:23 PM]
November 6, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20555] (MRW) [Entered: 11/06/2020 04:14 PM]
November 4, 2020 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9435195-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion due on 12/14/2020 for Appellant Michael Tyler. Brief in Support due on 12/14/2020 for Appellant Michael Tyler [20-20555] (JMW) [Entered: 11/04/2020 08:38 AM]
November 4, 2020 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:16-CV-2328. Electronic ROA due on 11/19/2020. [20-20555] (JMW) [Entered: 11/04/2020 08:42 AM]
October 26, 2020 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Tyler [20-20555] (MRW) [Entered: 10/26/2020 11:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tyler v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Michael Tyler
Represented By: Michael Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?