Xie v. Univ TX MD Anderson
| Richard Gonzalez, University of Texas at Houston Police Department, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Charles G. Dunn, Vicki King and Steve Haydon |
| Medical Doctor Keping Xie |
| 20-20622 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/08/2021 for Appellant Keping Xie. [20-20622] (MRW) [Entered: 01/25/2021 09:35 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20622] (MRW) [Entered: 01/25/2021 09:34 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mary Henry, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 01/10/2021 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [20-20622] (CCR) [Entered: 01/18/2021 09:49 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-5014. Electronic ROA due on 02/02/2021. [20-20622] (CCR) [Entered: 01/18/2021 09:50 AM] |
| NO COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIVED for Ms. Mary Henry. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mary Henry, Dt. Ct. Rprt. Time Begins: 12/08/2020. Transcript deadlines created - Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 01/07/2021 for Mary Henry, Court Reporter [20-20622] (CCR) [Entered: 12/24/2020 11:48 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Joyce A. Keating for Appellant Keping Xie in 20-20622 [20-20622] (CCR) [Entered: 12/17/2020 10:53 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Keping Xie. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Mary Henry, Proceeding Type and Date: Hearing 02/13/2020 , Hearing 03/12/2020. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 12/18/2020 for Mary Henry, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9458171-2 ] [20-20622] (CCR) [Entered: 12/08/2020 04:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Joyce A. Keating for Mr. Keping Xie for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20622] (Joyce A. Keating ) [Entered: 12/08/2020 10:15 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Keping Xiefor the Court to process. Date of service: 12/08/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Daaboul; Attorney for Appellants: Keating, Krenek. [20-20622] (Joyce A. Keating ) [Entered: 12/08/2020 10:23 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Rola Daaboul for Mr. Charles G. Dunn, Mr. Richard Gonzalez, Mr. Steve Haydon, Ms. Vicki King, University of Texas at Houston Police Department and University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20622] (Rola Daaboul ) [Entered: 12/08/2020 02:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Rola Daaboul for Appellee Steve Haydon in 20-20622, Attorney Rola Daaboul for Appellee Richard Gonzalez in 20-20622, Attorney Rola Daaboul for Appellee Vicki King in 20-20622, Attorney Rola Daaboul for Appellee Charles G. Dunn in 20-20622, Attorney Rola Daaboul for Appellee University of Texas at Houston Police Department in 20-20622, Attorney Rola Daaboul for Appellee University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in 20-20622 [20-20622] (CCR) [Entered: 12/08/2020 04:46 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9455852-2] Transcript order due on 12/21/2020 for Appellant Keping Xie [20-20622] (DLM) [Entered: 12/04/2020 10:51 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Keping Xie [20-20622] (NFD) [Entered: 11/30/2020 09:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
