USA v. Okoro
| Chijioke Victor Okoro, also known as Chiji V. Okoro, also known as Victor Okoro |
| United States of America |
| 20-20631 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Chijioke Victor Okoro. Date of service: 01/29/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Lyerla; Attorney for Appellants: Prinz, Simmons, Williamson [20-20631] (Kisshia Zalika Simmons ) [Entered: 01/30/2021 12:00 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Kathryne Gray [ # 9492281-2 ] [20-20631] (CCR) [Entered: 01/28/2021 04:11 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Attorney Ms. Kathryne Gray for Appellee USA to withdraw as counsel [9492281-2]. Date of Service: 01/28/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Gray, Lyerla; Attorney for Appellants: Prinz, Simmons, Williamson [20-20631] (Kathryne Gray ) [Entered: 01/28/2021 03:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kisshia Zalika Simmons for party(s) Appellant Chijioke Victor Okoro, in case 20-20631 [20-20631] (CCR) [Entered: 01/25/2021 02:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [20-20631] (Kisshia Zalika Simmons ) [Entered: 01/22/2021 04:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Christopher Thomas Lyerla for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 20-20631 [20-20631] (CCR) [Entered: 01/18/2021 01:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20631] (Christopher Thomas Lyerla ) [Entered: 01/15/2021 09:06 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kathryne Gray for Appellee USA in 20-20631 [20-20631] (CCR) [Entered: 12/22/2020 11:49 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/01/2021 for Appellant Chijioke Victor Okoro. [20-20631] (DDL) [Entered: 12/22/2020 09:59 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20631] (DDL) [Entered: 12/22/2020 09:57 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Kathryne Gray for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20631] (Kathryne Gray ) [Entered: 12/21/2020 03:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Peter D. Williamson, Esq. for Mr. Chijioke Victor Okoro for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20631] (Peter D. Williamson ) [Entered: 12/18/2020 12:52 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [20-20631] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Chijioke Victor Okoro advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 12/18/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gray; Attorney for Appellants: Prinz, Williamson [20-20631] (Peter D. Williamson ) [Entered: 12/18/2020 12:54 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-4837. Electronic ROA due on 01/04/2021. [20-20631] (CCR) [Entered: 12/18/2020 04:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Peter D. Williamson for Appellant Chijioke Victor Okoro in 20-20631 [20-20631] (CCR) [Entered: 12/18/2020 03:12 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9458842-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 12/23/2020 for Appellant Chijioke Victor Okoro. [20-20631] (SEP) [Entered: 12/08/2020 04:32 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Chijioke Victor Okoro [20-20631] (CCR) [Entered: 12/03/2020 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
