Chetlin v. Exxon Mobil Oil
| Medora Chetlin |
| Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation |
| 20-20641 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 02/08/2021 for Appellant Medora Chetlin. Appellee's Brief due on 02/24/2021 for Appellee Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation [20-20641] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Medora Chetlin. Date of service: 01/25/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Cheeseman, Soloway; Attorney for Appellant: Scott [20-20641] (Leroy Brenardo Scott ) [Entered: 01/25/2021 09:05 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Leroy Brenardo Scott for Appellant Medora Chetlin in 20-20641 [20-20641] (CCR) [Entered: 01/20/2021 02:45 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20641] (Leroy Brenardo Scott ) [Entered: 01/19/2021 04:11 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [20-20641] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Medora Chetlin advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 01/19/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Cheeseman, Soloway; Attorney for Appellant: Scott [20-20641] (Leroy Brenardo Scott ) [Entered: 01/19/2021 04:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Joy Michele Soloway for party(s) Appellee Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation, in case 20-20641 [20-20641] (CCR) [Entered: 01/13/2021 12:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [20-20641] (Joy Michele Soloway ) [Entered: 01/12/2021 05:06 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/25/2021 for Appellant Medora Chetlin. [20-20641] (MRW) [Entered: 12/16/2020 11:58 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [20-20641] (MRW) [Entered: 12/16/2020 11:58 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9463751-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [20-20641] (CCR) [Entered: 12/15/2020 04:40 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-1986. Electronic ROA due on 12/30/2020. [20-20641] (CCR) [Entered: 12/15/2020 04:43 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Medora Chetlin. [20-20641] (SEP) [Entered: 12/09/2020 12:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Chetlin v. Exxon Mobil Oil | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Medora Chetlin | |
| Represented By: | Leroy Brenardo Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly Frances Cheeseman |
| Represented By: | Joy Michele Soloway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
