Matthew Woodley Tribal Trust v. Mary Gallaspy Charitable Trust, et al
SWEPI L P - PARTNERSHIP, VINE OIL & GAS HAYNESVILLE, L.L.C., ANADARKO U.S. OFFSHORE, L.L.C., JEEMS BAYOU PRODUCTION CORPORATION, MARY R. GALLASPY CHARITABLE TRUST NUMBER 2, NABORS WELL SERVICES COMPANY, MARY R. GALLASPY CHARITABLE TRUST NUMBER 1, VINE OIL & GAS, L.P., MAC A. GUARINO and ROCKING G FARMS |
MATTHEW WOODLEY TRIBAL TRUST DESCENDANTS, by Jerry Woodley Thomas Aniyunwiya of the Moorish Clan El |
20-30179 |
March 17, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DISMISSAL NOTICE ISSUED for DIS-1 Remedy due on 06/08/2020 for Appellant Matthew Woodley Tribal Trust Descendants (Monitoring for descendants to advise as to counsl of record for the Trust). Reason: COVID-19. [20-30179] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/12/2020 08:49 AM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Letter Rogatory received 05/04/2020, from Appellant Matthew Woodley Tribal Trust Descendants, because it does not apply to this appeal. [20-30179] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/04/2020 02:43 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9278009-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 04/08/2020 for Appellant Matthew Woodley Tribal Trust Descendants to advise as to representation on appeal. [20-30179] (AGL) [Entered: 03/24/2020 08:11 AM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Matthew Woodley Tribal Trust Descendants [20-30179] (AGL) [Entered: 03/17/2020 07:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.